"Real Art" Statement

We will understand our environment, what surrounds us, as tools to work with. Objects, people, but also the relationship we have with them will be valid. Our feelings too. Only by using a personal content will we be able to work from it to misunderstand each other and create discourses. The relationship with your mother will be understood to work on the maternal relationship, in no case will it be faithful and direct to the real situation. There will be nothing real in the speech even though the relationship is real. Your partner will agree to talk about relationships, under no circumstances will your partner be discussed. The actual content will not be highlighted, so that the viewer can be surprised if they want. From the beginning, the relations with the material used will be annulled, failing from the first moment and in an announced manner. The implied content will have to understand that the speech does not talk about it. In the event that it is a person, it will be consulted, within the possibilities, if this person understands and allows it. As the authors of the work, we must have personal involvement with the content worked on so that we are affected in a different way to the viewer, who will in no case be the same, then we would have failed. Direct relationships, such as family ones, will be a resource to make these same relationships explicit, whatever our personal ones may be. If we work with people, the life situation, whether alive or dead, will be irrelevant. The discourse and our personal situation may coincide. We will use real content to talk about our concerns that affect us but that does not mean we are affected by the concern. It will not have an identity formalism, and it will be possible to nurture those that the author agrees with. The main motivation is to create a duality of direct work towards the viewer and the author, and that both are affected in different ways. For this reason, the more real the relationship with the treatise, the more affected the author will be, without the viewer identifying it. To talk about what concerns us we will have to use our reality in order to create a dichotomy between us and the same discourse. All proposals that meet this premise will be valid.